On the basis of these, we argue that the bilingualised dictionary is very effective as it is compatible with all types of individual preferences. The results show the distribution of the different look-up patterns and the differences between them. Each learner was classified by his favourite look-up pattern, whether it was using one specific language, or different languages for different words, or both languages for the same words. Learners' responses were divided into Hebrew-motivated, English-motivated, English- and Hebrew-motivated. One response of each two was an exact equivalent, the other an approximate one. Two responses on each test item corresponded to the Hebrew part, two to the English part. The subjects were given a multiple choice test in which they were asked to mark the correct meaning or meanings of the target items. The five distractors were given with the correct entries. In five items, the English part of the entry was wrong, in the other five-the Hebrew. But in the case of the target items, a mismatch between the English and the Hebrew parts of the entry was built in. These were presented in their bilingualised form, with the monolingual information and the translation. The test items were 15 unfamiliar low frequency words (10 targets, 5 distractors). Seventy EFL learners, native speakers of Hebrew participated in the experiment. But what part of the entry do learners read when they look up an unfamiliar word: the monolingual, the bilingual, or both? This was the research question of the study. Bilingualised dictionaries contain the monolingual information about a word and its translation into the learner's mother tongue.
0 kommentar(er)
